On the Achilles Heel of John Locke's Second Treatise: Slavery and Land Ownership
As the Wikipedia article on "Achilles heel" currently begins, "An Achilles' heel is a weakness in spite of overall strength." John Locke's Second Treatise on Government: Of Civil Government is an amazing achievement, that unlike Achilles, remains standing and strong to this day. But its weakest chapters are those where John Locke discusses slavery and land ownership. Even there, there a points where John Locke's arguments are very strong. But there are other points where he is trying to make a case that is difficult to make.
It has been very interesting for me to wrestle with both the strong and weak points of John Locke's treatment of slavery and land ownership in a series of blog posts every other week for six months. I have disagreed with John Locke much more in these posts than in the posts on earlier chapters that you can see laid out in "John Locke's State of Nature and State of War." Here are my posts reacting to John Locke's treatment of slavery and land ownership in his Second Treatise:
Chapter IV. Of Slavery
Chapter V. Of Property
John Locke: Rivalry in Consumption Makes Private Property Unavoidable
John Locke on How Things That Are No One's Property Become Someone's Property
John Locke Off Base with His Assumption That There Was Plenty of Land at the Time of Acquisition
John Locke: Land Title is Needed to Protect Buildings and Improvements from Expropriation
John Locke Pretends Land Ownership Goes Back to the Original Peopling of the Planet
Update: Links to posts on earlier and later chapters can be found in these aggregator posts:
Posts on Chapters I-III: John Locke's State of Nature and State of War
Posts on Chapters IV-V: On the Achilles Heel of John Locke's Second Treatise: Slavery and Land Ownership
Posts on Chapters VI-VII : John Locke Against Natural Hierarchy
Posts on Chapters VIII-XI: John Locke's Argument for Limited Government